---
title: "My Top 5 Tools as a Web Developer (2026)"
description: "Tools don’t make you a great engineer, but the right ones remove friction: faster feedback, safer releases, and fewer “mystery problems”. Here are the 5 I rely on most in 2026."
canonical_url: "https://liviu.dev/blog/3/my-top-5-tools-as-a-software-developer"
---

> Index of every page on this site: [llms.txt](https://liviu.dev/llms.txt)

Tools don’t make you a great engineer — but the right ones remove friction: faster feedback, safer releases, and fewer “mystery problems”.

These are the five I rely on most in 2026, in roughly the order they impact my day-to-day work.

---

## 1) Chrome (and DevTools) — still the fastest truth

For web work, browser DevTools are still the shortest path from “this feels broken” to “here’s why”.

What I use constantly:

- Performance + network analysis (Core Web Vitals, waterfalls, caching)
- React/Vue devtools for component-level debugging
- Lighthouse as a *starting point* (not the final verdict)

If you’re leading a web team, treating DevTools skills as “optional” is leaving a lot of efficiency on the table.

---

## 2) VS Code / Cursor-class IDEs — the feedback loop multiplier

In 2026, IDEs are not just editors. They’re where refactors get safer, and where teams standardize quality.

My baseline setup usually includes:

- Format-on-save + lint + typechecking in the editor
- Strong navigation (go-to definition, find references, rename)
- AI-assisted drafting/refactors (useful when paired with good tests and review discipline)

The goal isn’t “faster typing”. It’s **faster confidence**.

---

## 3) CI as a product (GitHub Actions / GitLab CI / Buildkite)

If CI feels slow or flaky, teams compensate by shipping on intuition.

What I optimize for:

- Fast, reliable checks (unit + typecheck + lint)
- Clear failure output (so the fix is obvious)
- Preview environments for UI work
- Dependency + security scanning as a baseline

CI is not a “pipeline”. It’s your team’s shared safety net.

---

## 4) Observability (Sentry + logs/metrics/traces)

In production, you don’t debug with opinions.

In 2026, I consider this non-negotiable for serious products:

- Error tracking (Sentry-class) with releases and source maps
- Structured logging (so you can search, correlate, and explain)
- Metrics/traces for performance and reliability hotspots

If you can’t answer “what changed?” and “who is impacted?” quickly, you’re flying blind.

---

## 5) A modern JS toolchain (pnpm, Vite, TypeScript)

Most “tooling pain” in web teams is dependency management + build speed + type safety.

What I like in 2026:

- `pnpm` for predictable, fast installs in monorepos
- Vite-class dev servers for fast iteration
- TypeScript as the default in non-trivial codebases

These aren’t “nice-to-have”. They reduce the hidden tax of day-to-day development.

---

## What I don’t optimize for anymore

I care less about “the perfect tool list” and more about:

- Short feedback loops
- Fewer production surprises
- Team-wide consistency

If a tool doesn’t meaningfully improve those outcomes, it’s usually not worth introducing.

## Sitemap

See the full [sitemap](https://liviu.dev/sitemap.md) for all pages.